胎记的剧情介绍,天性与后天的培养究竟哪个更重要?本·莫林和妻子凯瑟琳·奥尼尔都是备受尊敬的科学家,两人进行了一项他们认为能改变人类对自己身份认知的实验:用与三个孩子遗传的天性相悖的方式抚养他们,最终证明后天对孩子的抚养可以胜过孩子先天的天性。他们希望证明人都具备达成任何成就的潜能。本和凯瑟琳在实验中发现了家庭的可贵,比起实验的科学真相,后者微不足道。
In 1977, two respected scientists, Ben Morin and his wife Catherine quit their jobs at the university to conduct an experiment they think will revolutionize our understanding of human identity. The project aims to raise three children contrarily to their genetic predispositions to prove the ultimate power of nurture over nature. They want to prove that everyone has the same potential to become anything. Maya, a newborn girl adopted from two feebleminded parents, is raised to be smart, while Maurice, a newborn boy adopted from two anger-prone parents, is raised to be a pacifist. Finally, their own biological son Luke, who comes from a long lineage of scientific brains, is raised to become a revered artist. The experiment will reveal little scientific truth, but rather lead Ben and Catherine to discover the true value of family.
一般对加拿大电影没太多期待,但这部非常好看!新生儿就像一张白纸,后天教育胜过遗传基因,无论你想不想走父母给你选择的路,你都已经走在那条路上了。实验的第一代父母已经在考虑培养孙辈了,父母真的是这世界上最不能偷懒的职业。
(剧透)概念是不错的。但不知是受困于真人真事改编还是什么,执行得并不好。不明白以大人为研究对象是想研究什么?也没在书名中反映出来啊?而且这类有伦理问题的书也给出版吗?感觉影片在基调上很犹豫,幽默温情、伦理讨论还是反转抓马?不是说反类型不行,但就是没击中的点。古迪子的表演很一般吧。
内容和影片拍摄手法实在是不兼容,别别扭扭也不清不楚,就是马修老师还是一如既往的帅气可爱,没了。
做足心理准备结果发现没有想象中那么差啦表演还是很到位的,只是影片不敢走的更尖锐,最后保持在家庭温情线就失了开头那种一丝现实荒诞主义的灵气。#SIFF2018#
想和matthew goode生猴子(。 剧本真的弱 感觉侧面证明了基因还是会有点影响的... 故事没有emotional anchor 只是东一下西一下交代了一个比较猎奇的设定而已